I’ve mentioned this before but it bears repeating: when Mike Hargrove was here, I remember him saying that the 40-50 game mark is when you get your first chance to really understand what kind of team you have. I’m well aware that Hargrove’s teams routinely tanked late in the season, though, so we can agree now that this is an imperfect measurement.
Imperfect, but still worthwhile. 40 games represent (almost) 25% of the season. Meaning that we can stop saying “it’s still early.” It isn’t early — we’re entering the grind. The team has officially played enough games for us to step back and make some reasonable evaluations.
Let’s start with the obvious, which is the record. At 21-19 the O’s sit in third place, 2.5 games back of the division-leading Rays. Nobody figured on this in March, and if you claim you did you then you’d better come up with proof. For the rest of us, it’s fair to say that expectations have already been exceeded.
Once we dig into the details, though, it becomes something of a mixed bag. Let’s break it down.
The Good
The Orioles are 12-6 at home. They’re 10-5 in one-run games, after going 13-31 last year. George Sherrill has 15 saves already, when a lot of early prognosticators predicted he’d barely get 15 chances. Jim Johnson is pitching like an All Star out of the bullpen. Daniel Cabrera has been a revelation, Garrett Olson looks great, and Jeremy Guthrie has been solid. Nick Markakis — despite his deflated average — has reached base safely in 36 of 40 games. Freddie Bynum has taken preliminary steps toward solidifying the shortstop position.
And, most importantly, Dave Trembley has these guys playing hard and believing they can win no matter what.
The Bad
They’re just not hitting — the collective average is just .246, 25th in baseball. They’re only 8-7 against the AL East, with a lot more games to come against those teams. 10-5 in one-run games is good, but they’ve had way too many comeback wins. The baserunning has been a major issue. Adam Loewen is looking more and more like a disappointment. They lack depth — both here and in the minors — at a lot of positions.
I know I’m probably missing quite a bit, so please chime in with your own impressions in the comments.
All in all, though, I think the early verdict is in. The 2008 Baltimore Orioles are a better team than we thought they’d be. They’re exciting and inspiring, and they’re making the Lost Season a hell of a lot more interesting than some of seasons we weren’t willing to concede. They’re not going to contend for a division title, but they’re not going to contend for “worst team ever” status, either.
They’re also hanging on by a thread a lot of the time, and they will — bet on it — eventually face a stretch where the breaks don’t go their way.
I stand by my prediction of 70 wins for now. I’ll try to remember to do another “State of the Orioles” post like this at the 80 and 120 game marks (remind me if I don’t).
Where do you all stand?